INFORMATION ÜBER UNS MEDIENSPIEGEL TERMINE SUPPORTER LINKS SITEMAP QUICK E-MAIL
STARTSEITE
  PROPAGANDA SECURITY STUDIES   FORSCHUNG UND LEHRE
NEWS NEWS ARCHIV ALLGEMEINES GESCHICHTE SPECIALS
"Bound" to Cooperate
Referneces
 


(23)
  Intelligence Cooperation or Dependence?

Cf. Gerald Theimer, Der Fall Heinrich Dürmayer, in: Öffentliche Sicherheit H. 7/8 (1995) 18-21.
  SURVEY

CONTENT

INTELLIGENCE COOPERATION
OR DEPENDENCE?

REFERENCES (1) - (2)
REFERENCES (3) - (4)
REFERENCES (5) - (22)
REFERENCES (23) - (38)
(23) - (32)
(33) - (38)
 
     
 
(24)
  Among the rare studies focussing on the Stapo since 1945 cf. Ulrike Wetz, Geschichte der Wiener Polizei-Direktion vom Jahre 1945 bis zum Jahre 1955, mit Berücksichtigung der Zeit vor 1945, phil. Diss. Wien 1971; Alpen-Stasi: Die II. Republik im Zerrspiegel der Staatspolizei, ed. Hans G. Zeger et al. (Linz 1990) and Helene Polaczek, Zur österreichischen Staatspolizei in der II. Republik, geisteswiss. Dipl.Arb. Wien 1993.    
 
 
(25)
On Austria’s post-war position internationally cf. Günter Bischof, The Leverage of the Weak: Austria in the First Cold War, 1945-1955 (London 1999).
 
(26)
For a very useful general discussion of intelligence liaison cf. the excellent chapter “Intelligence Cooperation” in: Michael Hermann, Intelligence Power in Peace and War (Cambridge 1996) 200-218.
 
 
(27)
Though this dependency tends to be mutual nowadays, as even America, in its war on terrorism, has become aware of the importance of having friends and partners in a pervasive global intelligence network. Cf. David Ignatius, For Spying Bush Needs Friends, in: International Herald Tribune, May 25/26, 2002. This dependency of U.S. foreign intelligence was particularly strong in the 1950s, as openly acknowledged in the Frank Church Investigation Committee Report: “In the period 1952 to 1963 the Agency (i.e. the CIA) acquired most of its clandestine information through liaison arrangements with foreign governments.” In: Final Report: Supplementary Detailed Staff Report on Foreign and Military Intelligence, Book IV, 94th Congress, 2nd Session (April 1976) 49 ff. and 69ff.
 
(28)
Cf. Jeffrey T. Richelson, The Calculus of Intelligence Cooperation, in: Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 4 (1990) Nr. 3, 309.
 
 
(29)
Cf. H. Bradford Westerfield, America and the World of Intelligence Liaison, in: Intelligence and National Security 11 (1996) Nr. 3, 52f.
 
 
(30)
Criticism, particularly from the left, has always argued that U.S.-sponsored Elint and Sigint installations in Austria do not serve Austrian intelligence purposes but only profit American and NATO interests. Cf. Hans Wolker, Geheimdienst gegen Neutralität, in: Weg und Ziel 1981/6, 249.
 
 
(31)
Cf.Peter Klerks, An Inventory of European Intelligence Services (Amsterdam 1993) in: http://www.blythe.org/Intelligence/readme/Eurointel, 8.
 
 
(32)
When this membership commenced has been kept secret; most likely it predates the end of the Cold War, though there is disagreement among intelligence experts. Cf. Richelson, Calculus, 318.
 
 
(33)
Cf. Bradford, Intelligence Liaison, pp. 539-543. This factor is clearly addressed in the following definition of intelligence cooperation: “Liaison means sharing information and working with foreign intelligence and police services. It is not without risk, depending on the country. ... But it is in a different category from espionage – persuading foreigners with money, ideology, or other inducements to provide information, secretly, on their own country’s politics and institutions” in: In From the Cold. The Report of the 20th Century Fund Task Force on the Future of U.S. Intelligence (New York 1996) 13. TOP

REFERENCES (1) - (2)
REFERENCES (3) - (4)
REFERENCES (5) - (22)
REFERENCES (23) - (38)
(23) - (32)
(33) - (38)
   
 
 
(34)
William R. Johnson, Thwarting Enemies at Home and Abroad: How to be a Counterintelligence Officer (Bethesda, MD 1987) 144.
 
(35)
Tim Weiner, U.S. Spied on Its World War II Allies, in: New York Times, August 11, 1993, 9.
 
 
(36)
Significantly and already several months before 9/11 the chairman of the American National Intelligence Council (NIC), a think tank of senior analysts reporting directly to the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) had asked for nothing less than a revolution in collaboration within government(s) and with liaison abroad. Cf. John C. Gannon, The Role of Intelligence Services in a Globalized World (=paper given at Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Berlin, 21 May 2001, available at: http://www.cia.gov/nic/speeches/html)
 
(37)
Cf. Robert David Steele. The New Craft of Intelligence: Personal, Public and Political (Fairfax, VA 2002)
 
 
(38)
Cf. Towards a European Intelligence Policy, ed. Alessandro Politi (=Chaillot Paper 34, December 1998, available at: http://www.iss-eu.org/chaillot/chai34e.html); Malcolm Anderson/ Joanna Apap, Changing Conceptions of Security and their Implications for EU Justice and Home Affairs Cooperation (=CEPS Policy Brief Nr. 26, October 2002, available at: http://www.ceps.be) and Arthur Hulnick, Co-operation in the Post-Cold War Era: A New Game Plan? In: International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 5 (1991/92) 455-466.
 
  ACIPSS - HOME   SEITENANFANG   QUICK E-MAIL   SITEMAP